Don't look at me, but these guys [link] with their weirdness are trying to pin Marijuana to only furthering the risk of testicular cancer for men 18-44. What. A bunch. Of shit.

If that was the case, I'm PRETTY SURE they would figure that out a while back. They have only tested a small number of men, so I think it's ridiculous they're trying to blame an herb. They just suck at their job.

I can understand if the shit was laced [like Crystal Meth or something...] or had bug spray on it that it may have adverse affects, but srsly, testicular cancer?

I think they need a good backhanding for making that assumption. :>